Goldenford home page

Editorial and Technical Standards

 


start of menu

scroll to page content | set display options

quick menu

    book pages     author pages     site map

main menu

 home

 books

 for authors
   what's different?
   marketing
   editing
   standards
   next steps

 links

 contact

 


end of menu - start of page content

scroll to menu | scroll to top | set display options

Goldenford home page

Editorial and Technical Standards

Manuscripts must conform to our standards, as set out at the time of submission. This is to minimise costs for our authors as well as ourselves. You will need to convince us in the exceptional case where there are good grounds for departing from the standards. We will still require consistency.

When we first receive your book manuscript (electronically only please), a number of directors will read it and jointly decide whether it meets our criteria. We publish what the directors - all writers themselves - consider to be enjoyable, marketable books which other publishers cannot 'fit into their lists'.

Next, we review quality. Manuscripts which follow our standards can be finalised quickly. Those that do not can take many hours to finalise. If our directors find a significant number of problems, the book will be returned for revision.

In the production process we will:

Technical standards

Our technical standards are designed so that your book does not need substantial manual editing when the document reflows (repaginates) as a result of production changes. Therefore, the standards on the following three pages are mandatory (these standards are maintained by an associate on a different web site)

Our standards are set out in the context of OpenOffice Writer, which we recommend as being better than Word for long manuscripts. However, authors are free to use any word processor, including Word, providing the manuscript can be opened in Word or in Writer with the recommended style sequence intact.

We recommend that authors adopt these standards early in the writing cycle, even before the decision is made to consider Goldenford as the publisher. Following the standards will benefit all authors, irrespective of the publisher you use.

 


end of content - start of footer

scroll to page content | scroll to menu | scroll to top

graphics version of this page

If you have comments, please email the webmaster
Editorial and Technical Standards (standards) updated 23:20 Feb 20 2006     (server 9.6.19/c)

click for OnePoyle Resources for Writers